I wonder if THE CATCHER IN THE
RYE would be as famous for its iconic main protagonist if Holden Caulfield had
actually been Helen Caulfield, a moody teenage girl who
measures everyone by her self-appointed phoniness meter. Or if the genders were reversed
between the male and female protagonists in classics like JANE EYRE and PRIDE
AND PREJUDICE....Let's have Rochester be the hired butler or live-in tutor who
falls in love with Jane Eyre, the lady of the manor. Would readers be as sympathetic to
Jane when they find out she was preparing to tie the knot with Rochester, all
the while having a secret husband with a mental illness locked up in the red room?
Let's have Darcy be female. After we watch
her rudely diss a man named Bennett by berating him within his earshot that
he wasn't good looking or rich enough, would most readers continue to
root for such a woman to find love?
I feel that mainstream readers can more easily forgive male protagonists who err, judge others, or are not so charming than leading ladies with these same issues. For example, a male who is aloof can be excused as being the
brooding type while there is another b-word reserved for females who behave
this way.
I can
read about a female protagonist with an unlikable characteristic or two. Ideally, she would have some
redeeming qualities to complement her unlikable ones. But you know what, I've
actually finished books featuring unlikable female protagonists without any strong redeeming qualities (though rather infrequently). Such a book might feature a leading lady who exists mainly to shock readers
by her outrageous behavior, and if there's a really captivating
setting or plot to compensate, I can sometimes stick it out.
Just because a character has unlikable characteristics, it doesn't mean they should automatically be labeled an unlikable character. Sometimes one whom critics refer to as an unlikable female character, by my interpretation, is just a real person with flaws. An example of that would be the character of Lee Fiora in Curtis Sittenfeld's PREP. A number of online reviewers find Lee unlikable, and I disagree with that assessment. Curtis Sittenfeld addresses her "unlikable" characters in an interview with The Guardian. Here, Curtis acknowledges the faulty notion about an unlikable quality given to a female character being perceived as a mistake.
Female
characters audiences disapprove of aren't only found in books. Anna Gunn, the
actress who played Skyler White in Breaking Bad, wrote an editorial piece in The New York Times where she shares that her character is despised
among some fans of the show. Anna hypothesizes that those who hate on Skyler
might be threatened by seeing a woman who won't "suffer silently." (I'm in Season 2 of Breaking Bad, so please NO SPOILERS in the comments section!)
Girls and women, real or fictional, shouldn't have to be adorable and agreeable 24/7, especially when they're encountering something or someone difficult. And yet, I don't find it easy to write a female protagonist with distinct unlikable qualities, and still have readers root for her. But I'd like to nail this someday.
Do you think audiences set higher standards for leading ladies than leading men?
Can you think of any unlikable female protagonists in books, TV, or movies who you rooted for or let grow on you?
Image source: www.amctv.com
